BIZTRAC BETA
Other captive investment companies

JEK STAVANGER HOLDING AS

Org. no. 817607942 Limited company (AS) Sandnes Incorporated 2016 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Operating profit NOK −42,000
Equity NOK 1.0m
Incorporated 2016
Share capital NOK 30,000

Signals

1 flags
  • Driftsunderskudd 2025 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−42k kr).

JEK STAVANGER HOLDING AS is registered as a limited company in Sandnes, Rogaland with organisation number 817607942. The business is classified under other captive investment companies (NACE 64.323). The company was incorporated in 2016. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 30 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Investeringsselskap, herunder investering i aksjer og andeler og deltakelse i andre selskaper, og annet som står i naturlig forbindelse med dette.”.

Key figures · 2025

Operating profit
NOK −42,000
Equity
NOK 1.0m
Est. value
NOK 945,000

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
394.71
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
99.8%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns JEK STAVANGER HOLDING AS?

JON EIRIK HAUGNELAND KVITHYLL
JEK STAVANGER HOLDING AS
· NOK −42,000 profit

JEK STAVANGER HOLDING AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Which companies does JEK STAVANGER HOLDING AS own?

JEK STAVANGER HOLDING AS holds stakes in 2 companies:

See the full ownership structure →

Frequently asked questions about JEK STAVANGER HOLDING AS

Who owns JEK STAVANGER HOLDING AS?

JON EIRIK HAUGNELAND KVITHYLL is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

Who is the general manager of JEK STAVANGER HOLDING AS?

Jon Eirik Haugneland Kvithyll is registered as general manager of JEK STAVANGER HOLDING AS.

Where is JEK STAVANGER HOLDING AS based?

JEK STAVANGER HOLDING AS has its business address in Sandnes.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.