BIZTRAC BETA
COMPANY REGISTER PROFILE
831270802 ORG. NO. 7 SECTIONS
Active UPDATED 02.09.2026
Other real estate activities on a fee or contract basis

SKOGSBILVEILAGET SKARDBERGDALSVEIEN SA

Org. no. 831270802 Co-operation (SA) Eidsvoll Incorporated 1950 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Incorporated 1950

SKOGSBILVEILAGET SKARDBERGDALSVEIEN SA is registered as a co-operation in Eidsvoll, Akershus with organisation number 831270802. The business is classified under other real estate activities on a fee or contract basis (NACE 68.320). The company was incorporated in 1950. The company's stated purpose is: “Veilaget skal bygge og vedlikeholde en skogsbilveg fra Graslia over Skardbergdalen til og med Teig 4 gnr/bnr 175/18. Veglaget har som formål å redusere andelseiernes kostnader til uttransport av tømmer og å gjøre skog i vegens nytteområde tilgjengelig for aktiv skogforvaltning.”.

Who owns SKOGSBILVEILAGET SKARDBERGDALSVEIEN SA?

No shareholders are registered for SKOGSBILVEILAGET SKARDBERGDALSVEIEN SA in open Norwegian sources. Shareholder data exists mainly for limited companies (AS/ASA).

Frequently asked questions about SKOGSBILVEILAGET SKARDBERGDALSVEIEN SA

Who is the general manager of SKOGSBILVEILAGET SKARDBERGDALSVEIEN SA?

Hans Henrik Høibraaten is registered as general manager of SKOGSBILVEILAGET SKARDBERGDALSVEIEN SA.

Where is SKOGSBILVEILAGET SKARDBERGDALSVEIEN SA based?

SKOGSBILVEILAGET SKARDBERGDALSVEIEN SA has its business address in Eidsvoll.

Property

Business address Eidsvollbakken 34, 2080 Eidsvoll
Cadastral unit 3240-62/13/0/0
Building Enebolig · 1 unit

6 companies are registered at this address.

The address this company is registered at, from the company register and matched against the cadastre. It does not say who owns the property — a company may be a tenant, and the address is often its accountant's. Source: Brønnøysundregistrene and © Kartverket.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 02.09.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.