BIZTRAC BETA
COMPANY REGISTER PROFILE
879161452 ORG. NO. 2025 ACCOUNTS 8 SECTIONS
Active UPDATED 02.09.2026
Other building completion and finishing

CHAINCO BASE AS

Org. no. 879161452 Limited company (AS) Bremanger Incorporated 1997 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Operating profit NOK −95,000
Equity NOK −657,000
Incorporated 1997
Share capital NOK 2.5m

Signals

3 flags
  • Negativ egenkapital 2025 Bokført egenkapital er negativ (−657k kr).
  • Driftsunderskudd 2025 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−95k kr).
  • Ingen revisor Selskapet har ingen registrert revisor. Vanlig for små AS som har valgt bort revisjon, men verdt å merke seg.

CHAINCO BASE AS is registered as a limited company in Bremanger, Vestland with organisation number 879161452. The business is classified under other building completion and finishing (NACE 43.350). The company was incorporated in 1997. Registered share capital is NOK 2.5m, divided into 24650 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Utvikling av infrastruktur for industri- og maritim virksomhet, utleievirksomhet og varehandel. Selskapet kan også engasjere seg i andre selskaper med lignende virksomhet.”.

Former names: BOSSMANN AS

Key figures · 2025

Operating profit
NOK −95,000
▲ +22 %
Equity
NOK −657,000
▼ −17 %

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
0.01
Not satisfactory
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
-23.4%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Solidity capped at Weak because equity is below NOK 100,000.

Who owns CHAINCO BASE AS?

CHAINCO BASE AS
· NOK −95,000 profit

CHAINCO BASE AS has 2 registered shareholders:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about CHAINCO BASE AS

Who owns CHAINCO BASE AS?

CHAINCO AS is the largest registered owner, with 93.3%.

Where is CHAINCO BASE AS based?

CHAINCO BASE AS has its business address in Svelgen.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 02.09.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.