BIZTRAC BETA
Computer consultancy and computer facilities management activities

EIVIND BEKKELI HOLDING AS

Org. no. 890945392 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 2007 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Operating profit NOK −65,000
Equity NOK 240,000
Incorporated 2007
Share capital NOK 100,000

Signals

1 flags
  • Driftsunderskudd 2024 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−65k kr).

EIVIND BEKKELI HOLDING AS is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 890945392. The business is classified under computer consultancy and computer facilities management activities (NACE 62.200). The company was incorporated in 2007. Registered share capital is NOK 100,000, divided into 1 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Selv, gjennom hel- eller deleide selskaper eller ved samarbeid med andre virksomheter å forestå vedlikehold og installasjon av utstyr for lyd og bilde samt investeringer i aksjer, obligasjoner, selskapsandeler og andre verdipapirer og annen virksomhet beslektet med denne.”.

Key figures · 2024

Operating profit
NOK −65,000
Equity
NOK 240,000
Est. value
NOK 434,000

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
4.96
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
98.7%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns EIVIND BEKKELI HOLDING AS?

EIVIND BEKKELI
EIVIND BEKKELI HOLDING AS
· NOK −65,000 profit

EIVIND BEKKELI HOLDING AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Which companies does EIVIND BEKKELI HOLDING AS own?

EIVIND BEKKELI HOLDING AS holds stakes in 2 companies:

See the full ownership structure →

Frequently asked questions about EIVIND BEKKELI HOLDING AS

Who owns EIVIND BEKKELI HOLDING AS?

EIVIND BEKKELI is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

Where is EIVIND BEKKELI HOLDING AS based?

EIVIND BEKKELI HOLDING AS has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.