BIZTRAC BETA
Legal activities

ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS

Org. no. 913125312 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 2014 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 3.8m
Operating profit NOK 169,000
Equity NOK 467,000
Incorporated 2014
Share capital NOK 101,000

ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 913125312. The business is classified under legal activities (NACE 69.100). The company was incorporated in 2014. Registered share capital is NOK 101,000, divided into 101 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Advokatvirksomhet”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 3.8m in revenue and NOK 169,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 3.8m
Operating profit
NOK 169,000
Equity
NOK 467,000
Est. value
NOK 1.1m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
1.51
Good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
34.2%
Good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS?

MORTEN ENGESBAK
ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS
NOK 3.8m rev. · NOK 169,000 profit

ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Which companies does ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS own?

ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS holds a stake in 1 company:

See the full ownership structure →

Frequently asked questions about ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS

Who owns ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS?

MORTEN ENGESBAK is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS?

ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS had revenue of NOK 3.8m in 2025.

Who is the general manager of ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS?

Morten Engesbak is registered as general manager of ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS.

Where is ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS based?

ADVOKAT MORTEN ENGESBAK AS has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.