BIZTRAC BETA
Business and other management consultancy activities

RUNOP AS

Org. no. 913285093 Limited company (AS) Rana Incorporated 2014 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2024 NOK 784,000
Operating profit NOK 214,000
Equity NOK 809,000
Incorporated 2014
Share capital NOK 30,000

RUNOP AS is registered as a limited company in Rana, Nordland with organisation number 913285093. The business is classified under business and other management consultancy activities (NACE 70.200). The company was incorporated in 2014. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 300 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Salg av konsulenttjenester, samt det som naturlig hører til. Selskapet kan også eie anleggsmidler, samt aksjer i andre virksomheter og utøve aktivt forvaltning av disse.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2024 financial year, show NOK 784,000 in revenue and NOK 214,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2024

Revenue
NOK 784,000
Operating profit
NOK 214,000
Equity
NOK 809,000
Est. value
NOK 1.2m

Financial health · 2024

Liquidity
0.10
Not satisfactory
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
68.8%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns RUNOP AS?

RUNE MAGNE OPDAHL
RUNOP AS
NOK 784,000 rev. · NOK 214,000 profit

RUNOP AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Which companies does RUNOP AS own?

RUNOP AS holds stakes in 3 companies:

See the full ownership structure →

Frequently asked questions about RUNOP AS

Who owns RUNOP AS?

RUNE MAGNE OPDAHL is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of RUNOP AS?

RUNOP AS had revenue of NOK 784,000 in 2024.

Who is the general manager of RUNOP AS?

Rune Magne Opdahl is registered as general manager of RUNOP AS.

Where is RUNOP AS based?

RUNOP AS has its business address in Mo I Rana.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.