BIZTRAC BETA
Rental and operating of own or leased real estate

KLOSTERHEIMVEIEN 1 AS

Org. no. 916663072 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 1954 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2024 NOK −700
Operating profit NOK −108,000
Equity NOK 20.9m
Incorporated 1954
Share capital NOK 66,000

Signals

2 flags
  • Driftsunderskudd 2024 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−108k kr).
  • Nylig endring 2026-04-16 Aksjekapital registrert 2026-04-16.

KLOSTERHEIMVEIEN 1 AS is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 916663072. The business is classified under rental and operating of own or leased real estate (NACE 68.200). The company was incorporated in 1954. Registered share capital is NOK 66,000, divided into 9420 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Investere i fast eiendom eller selskaper som eier fast eiendom, og alt som dermed står i forbindelse.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2024 financial year, show NOK −700 in revenue and NOK −108,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2024

Revenue
NOK −700
Operating profit
NOK −108,000
Equity
NOK 20.9m
Est. value
NOK 19.0m

Financial health · 2024

Liquidity
66.14
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
98.9%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns KLOSTERHEIMVEIEN 1 AS?

KLOSTERHEIMVEIEN 1 INVEST AS
KLOSTERHEIMVEIEN 1 AS
NOK −700 rev. · NOK −108,000 profit

KLOSTERHEIMVEIEN 1 AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about KLOSTERHEIMVEIEN 1 AS

Who owns KLOSTERHEIMVEIEN 1 AS?

KLOSTERHEIMVEIEN 1 INVEST AS is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of KLOSTERHEIMVEIEN 1 AS?

KLOSTERHEIMVEIEN 1 AS had revenue of NOK −700 in 2024.

Where is KLOSTERHEIMVEIEN 1 AS based?

KLOSTERHEIMVEIEN 1 AS has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.