BIZTRAC BETA
COMPANY REGISTER PROFILE
916895062 ORG. NO. 2025 ACCOUNTS 8 SECTIONS
Active UPDATED 02.09.2026
Legal activities

FEND ADVOKATFIRMA DA

Org. no. 916895062 General partnership with shared liability (DA) Oslo Incorporated 2016 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 20.8m
Operating profit NOK 8.0m
Equity NOK 10.1m
Incorporated 2016

FEND ADVOKATFIRMA DA is registered as a general partnership with shared liability in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 916895062. The business is classified under legal activities (NACE 69.100). The company was incorporated in 2016. The company's stated purpose is: “Advokattjenester.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 20.8m in revenue and NOK 8.0m in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 20.8m
Operating profit
NOK 8.0m
Equity
NOK 10.1m
Est. value
NOK 32.2m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
5.14
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
80.5%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns FEND ADVOKATFIRMA DA?

No shareholders are registered for FEND ADVOKATFIRMA DA in open Norwegian sources. Shareholder data exists mainly for limited companies (AS/ASA).

Frequently asked questions about FEND ADVOKATFIRMA DA

What is the revenue of FEND ADVOKATFIRMA DA?

FEND ADVOKATFIRMA DA had revenue of NOK 20.8m in 2025.

Where is FEND ADVOKATFIRMA DA based?

FEND ADVOKATFIRMA DA has its business address in Oslo.

Property

Business address Universitetsgata 10, 0164 Oslo
Cadastral unit 301-209/391/0/0

10 companies are registered at this address.

The address this company is registered at, from the company register and matched against the cadastre. It does not say who owns the property — a company may be a tenant, and the address is often its accountant's. Source: Brønnøysundregistrene and © Kartverket.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 02.09.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.