BIZTRAC BETA
General cleaning of buildings

BARE RENHOLD SERVICE AS

Org. no. 918398341 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 2016 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 317,000
Operating profit NOK 13,000
Equity NOK 66,000
Incorporated 2016
Employees 5
Share capital NOK 30,000

BARE RENHOLD SERVICE AS is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 918398341. The business is classified under general cleaning of buildings (NACE 81.210). The company was incorporated in 2016 and has 5 registered employees. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 30 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Renholdsvirksomhet.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 317,000 in revenue and NOK 13,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 317,000
Operating profit
NOK 13,000
Equity
NOK 66,000
Est. value
NOK 93,000

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
1.31
Satisfactory
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
51.3%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Solidity capped at Weak because equity is below NOK 100,000.

Who owns BARE RENHOLD SERVICE AS?

THIRUSANTHAN MURUKUPILAY
BARE RENHOLD SERVICE AS
NOK 317,000 rev. · NOK 13,000 profit

BARE RENHOLD SERVICE AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about BARE RENHOLD SERVICE AS

Who owns BARE RENHOLD SERVICE AS?

THIRUSANTHAN MURUKUPILAY is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of BARE RENHOLD SERVICE AS?

BARE RENHOLD SERVICE AS had revenue of NOK 317,000 in 2025.

Who is the general manager of BARE RENHOLD SERVICE AS?

Sivanandatheva Rasaiah Kathirkamu is registered as general manager of BARE RENHOLD SERVICE AS.

Where is BARE RENHOLD SERVICE AS based?

BARE RENHOLD SERVICE AS has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.