BIZTRAC BETA
Combined facilities support activities

ECOFLOW AS

Org. no. 919883111 Limited company (AS) Lillestrøm Incorporated 2017 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2024 NOK 4.2m
Operating profit NOK 204,000
Equity NOK 259,000
Incorporated 2017
Share capital NOK 30,000

ECOFLOW AS is registered as a limited company in Lillestrøm, Akershus with organisation number 919883111. The business is classified under combined facilities support activities (NACE 81.100). The company was incorporated in 2017. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 30000 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Programmering og systemløsninger i bygg og anlegg for energitekniske områder. Salg og service av produkter og tjenester relatert til energisparende tiltak, samt å delta i annen virksomhet som står i forbindelse med dette formål. Videre kan selskapet ta del i andre selskaper av enhver art.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2024 financial year, show NOK 4.2m in revenue and NOK 204,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2024

Revenue
NOK 4.2m
Operating profit
NOK 204,000
Equity
NOK 259,000
Est. value
NOK 890,000

Financial health · 2024

Liquidity
4.53
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
7.7%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns ECOFLOW AS?

LASSE ERLING ROGNERUD
ECOFLOW AS
NOK 4.2m rev. · NOK 204,000 profit

ECOFLOW AS has 2 registered shareholders:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about ECOFLOW AS

Who owns ECOFLOW AS?

LASSE ERLING ROGNERUD is the largest registered owner, with 50.0%.

What is the revenue of ECOFLOW AS?

ECOFLOW AS had revenue of NOK 4.2m in 2024.

Who is the general manager of ECOFLOW AS?

Dave René Eriksen is registered as general manager of ECOFLOW AS.

Where is ECOFLOW AS based?

ECOFLOW AS has its business address in Sørum.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.