BIZTRAC BETA
Architectural activities

WE DO VISUALS AS

Org. no. 923387137 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 2019 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2024 NOK 19,000
Operating profit NOK 12,000
Equity NOK −18,000
Incorporated 2019
Share capital NOK 30,000

Signals

1 flags
  • Negativ egenkapital 2024 Bokført egenkapital er negativ (−18k kr).

WE DO VISUALS AS is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 923387137. The business is classified under architectural activities (NACE 71.110). The company was incorporated in 2019. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 100 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Arkitekttjenester vedrørende byggverk, grafisk og visuell kommunikasjonsdesign og hva dertil står i forbindelse.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2024 financial year, show NOK 19,000 in revenue and NOK 12,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2024

Revenue
NOK 19,000
Operating profit
NOK 12,000
Equity
NOK −18,000
Est. value
NOK 57,000

Financial health · 2024

Liquidity
0.73
Weak
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
-36.1%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Solidity capped at Weak because equity is below NOK 100,000.

Who owns WE DO VISUALS AS?

HÅKON DAHLSTRØM FORMOE
WE DO VISUALS AS
NOK 19,000 rev. · NOK 12,000 profit

WE DO VISUALS AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about WE DO VISUALS AS

Who owns WE DO VISUALS AS?

HÅKON DAHLSTRØM FORMOE is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of WE DO VISUALS AS?

WE DO VISUALS AS had revenue of NOK 19,000 in 2024.

Who is the general manager of WE DO VISUALS AS?

Håkon Dahlstrøm Formoe is registered as general manager of WE DO VISUALS AS.

Where is WE DO VISUALS AS based?

WE DO VISUALS AS has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.