BIZTRAC BETA
Computer consultancy and computer facilities management activities

DIGITAL DREAMS AS

Org. no. 923831975 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 2019 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 1.9m
Operating profit NOK 334,000
Equity NOK 30,000
Incorporated 2019
Share capital NOK 30,000

DIGITAL DREAMS AS is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 923831975. The business is classified under computer consultancy and computer facilities management activities (NACE 62.200). The company was incorporated in 2019. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 1000 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Selge konsulenttjenester, programvare og databehandlingsutstyr, samt å eie og forvalte verdipapirer og eiendom.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 1.9m in revenue and NOK 334,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 1.9m
Operating profit
NOK 334,000
Equity
NOK 30,000
Est. value
NOK 2.0m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
0.92
Weak
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
3.4%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Solidity capped at Weak because equity is below NOK 100,000.

Who owns DIGITAL DREAMS AS?

AUDUN HOLM ELLERTSEN
DIGITAL DREAMS AS
NOK 1.9m rev. · NOK 334,000 profit

DIGITAL DREAMS AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Which companies does DIGITAL DREAMS AS own?

DIGITAL DREAMS AS holds a stake in 1 company:

See the full ownership structure →

Frequently asked questions about DIGITAL DREAMS AS

Who owns DIGITAL DREAMS AS?

AUDUN HOLM ELLERTSEN is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of DIGITAL DREAMS AS?

DIGITAL DREAMS AS had revenue of NOK 1.9m in 2025.

Where is DIGITAL DREAMS AS based?

DIGITAL DREAMS AS has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.