BIZTRAC BETA
Other technical consultancy

KOMENT INORD AS

Org. no. 925199486 Limited company (AS) Tromsø Incorporated 2020 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2024 NOK 2.9m
Operating profit NOK −247,000
Equity NOK −781,000
Incorporated 2020
Share capital NOK 30,000

Signals

3 flags
  • Negativ egenkapital 2024 Bokført egenkapital er negativ (−781k kr).
  • Driftsunderskudd 2024 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−247k kr).
  • Nylig endring 2026-02-05 Adresseendring registrert 2026-02-05.

KOMENT INORD AS is registered as a limited company in Tromsø, Troms with organisation number 925199486. The business is classified under other technical consultancy (NACE 71.129). The company was incorporated in 2020. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 60 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Utvikling og drift av kommunikasjonskanaler, herunder relasjonsskapende aktiviteter.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2024 financial year, show NOK 2.9m in revenue and NOK −247,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2024

Revenue
NOK 2.9m
Operating profit
NOK −247,000
Equity
NOK −781,000

Financial health · 2024

Liquidity
0.17
Not satisfactory
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
-499.3%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Solidity capped at Weak because equity is below NOK 100,000.

Who owns KOMENT INORD AS?

POLARIS MEDIA NORD-NORGE AS
KOMENT INORD AS
NOK 2.9m rev. · NOK −247,000 profit

KOMENT INORD AS has 2 registered shareholders:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about KOMENT INORD AS

Who owns KOMENT INORD AS?

POLARIS MEDIA NORD-NORGE AS is the largest registered owner, with 51.7%.

What is the revenue of KOMENT INORD AS?

KOMENT INORD AS had revenue of NOK 2.9m in 2024.

Where is KOMENT INORD AS based?

KOMENT INORD AS has its business address in Tromsø.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.