BIZTRAC BETA
Day spa, sauna and steam bath activities

RAKNES MASSASJE AS

Org. no. 927466732 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 2021 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 579,000
Operating profit NOK −689
Equity NOK 24,000
Incorporated 2021
Share capital NOK 30,000

Signals

1 flags
  • Driftsunderskudd 2025 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−689 kr).

RAKNES MASSASJE AS is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 927466732. The business is classified under day spa, sauna and steam bath activities (NACE 96.230). The company was incorporated in 2021. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 30 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Tilby klassisk massasje til bedrifter og privatpersoner.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 579,000 in revenue and NOK −689 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 579,000
Operating profit
NOK −689
Equity
NOK 24,000
Est. value
NOK 416,000

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
0.96
Weak
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
17.9%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Solidity capped at Weak because equity is below NOK 100,000.

Who owns RAKNES MASSASJE AS?

KRISTIN OMRE RAKNES
RAKNES MASSASJE AS
NOK 579,000 rev. · NOK −689 profit

RAKNES MASSASJE AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about RAKNES MASSASJE AS

Who owns RAKNES MASSASJE AS?

KRISTIN OMRE RAKNES is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of RAKNES MASSASJE AS?

RAKNES MASSASJE AS had revenue of NOK 579,000 in 2025.

Who is the general manager of RAKNES MASSASJE AS?

Kristin Omre Raknes is registered as general manager of RAKNES MASSASJE AS.

Where is RAKNES MASSASJE AS based?

RAKNES MASSASJE AS has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.