BIZTRAC BETA
Development of building projects

ROGALAND INDUSTRIPARK SANDNES AS

Org. no. 928602575 Limited company (AS) Stavanger Incorporated 2022 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Operating profit NOK −26,000
Equity NOK −83,000
Incorporated 2022
Share capital NOK 30,000

Signals

3 flags
  • Negativ egenkapital 2025 Bokført egenkapital er negativ (−83k kr).
  • Driftsunderskudd 2025 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−26k kr).
  • Ingen revisor Selskapet har ingen registrert revisor. Vanlig for små AS som har valgt bort revisjon, men verdt å merke seg.

ROGALAND INDUSTRIPARK SANDNES AS is registered as a limited company in Stavanger, Rogaland with organisation number 928602575. The business is classified under development of building projects (NACE 68.120). The company was incorporated in 2022. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 30000 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Erverve, utvikle, oppføre og selge fast eiendom og alt som står i naturlig forbindelse med dette. Samt investere i selskaper med samme formål.”.

Key figures · 2025

Operating profit
NOK −26,000
Equity
NOK −83,000

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
Not available
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
-305.5%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Solidity capped at Weak because equity is below NOK 100,000.

Who owns ROGALAND INDUSTRIPARK SANDNES AS?

SVILAND UTVIKLING AS
ROGALAND INDUSTRIPARK SANDNES AS
· NOK −26,000 profit

ROGALAND INDUSTRIPARK SANDNES AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about ROGALAND INDUSTRIPARK SANDNES AS

Who owns ROGALAND INDUSTRIPARK SANDNES AS?

SVILAND UTVIKLING AS is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

Where is ROGALAND INDUSTRIPARK SANDNES AS based?

ROGALAND INDUSTRIPARK SANDNES AS has its business address in Stavanger.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.