BIZTRAC BETA
Rental and operating of own or leased real estate

VÅG SMART CITY AS

Org. no. 931692100 Limited company (AS) Gildeskål Incorporated 2023 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 515,000
Operating profit NOK 81,000
Equity NOK −304,000
Incorporated 2023
Share capital NOK 60,000

Signals

1 flags
  • Negativ egenkapital 2025 Bokført egenkapital er negativ (−304k kr).

VÅG SMART CITY AS is registered as a limited company in Gildeskål, Nordland with organisation number 931692100. The business is classified under rental and operating of own or leased real estate (NACE 68.200). The company was incorporated in 2023. Registered share capital is NOK 60,000, divided into 60000 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Selge varer og tjenester innen utleie av eiendom og annet som naturlig sammenfaller med dette, samt deltakelse i andre selskaper, investeringer og nærliggende virksomhet.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 515,000 in revenue and NOK 81,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 515,000
Operating profit
NOK 81,000
Equity
NOK −304,000
Est. value
NOK 554,000

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
0.70
Weak
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
-6.3%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Solidity capped at Weak because equity is below NOK 100,000.

Who owns VÅG SMART CITY AS?

KELPINOR AS
VÅG SMART CITY AS
NOK 515,000 rev. · NOK 81,000 profit

VÅG SMART CITY AS has 2 registered shareholders:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about VÅG SMART CITY AS

Who owns VÅG SMART CITY AS?

KELPINOR AS is the largest registered owner, with 50.0%.

What is the revenue of VÅG SMART CITY AS?

VÅG SMART CITY AS had revenue of NOK 515,000 in 2025.

Where is VÅG SMART CITY AS based?

VÅG SMART CITY AS has its business address in Sandhornøy.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.