BIZTRAC BETA
Uoppgitt

DAIMYO EKSTRA 110 AS

Org. no. 933755975 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 2024 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Operating profit NOK −6
Equity NOK −285,000
Incorporated 2024
Share capital NOK 30,000

Signals

3 flags
  • Negativ egenkapital 2024 Bokført egenkapital er negativ (−285k kr).
  • Driftsunderskudd 2024 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−6 kr).
  • Ingen revisor Selskapet har ingen registrert revisor. Vanlig for små AS som har valgt bort revisjon, men verdt å merke seg.

DAIMYO EKSTRA 110 AS is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 933755975. The business is classified under uoppgitt (NACE 00.000). The company was incorporated in 2024. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 30000 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Drift, kjøp, salg og utvikling av fast eiendom, herunder gjennom deltakelse i andre selskaper, samt virksomhet som står i forbindelse med dette. Selskapet kan også påta seg annen innteksgivende virksomhet.”.

Key figures · 2024

Operating profit
NOK −6
Equity
NOK −285,000

Financial health · 2024

Liquidity
Not available
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
-0.2%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Solidity capped at Weak because equity is below NOK 100,000.

Who owns DAIMYO EKSTRA 110 AS?

DAIMYO EIENDOM AS
DAIMYO EKSTRA 110 AS
· NOK −6 profit

DAIMYO EKSTRA 110 AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Which companies does DAIMYO EKSTRA 110 AS own?

DAIMYO EKSTRA 110 AS holds a stake in 1 company:

See the full ownership structure →

Frequently asked questions about DAIMYO EKSTRA 110 AS

Who owns DAIMYO EKSTRA 110 AS?

DAIMYO EIENDOM AS is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

Where is DAIMYO EKSTRA 110 AS based?

DAIMYO EKSTRA 110 AS has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.