BIZTRAC BETA
Other technical consultancy

NORDIC SITE SERVICES AS

Org. no. 935295017 Limited company (AS) Moss Incorporated 2025 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Operating profit NOK −114,000
Equity NOK −52,000
Incorporated 2025
Share capital NOK 70,000

Signals

2 flags
  • Negativ egenkapital 2025 Bokført egenkapital er negativ (−52k kr).
  • Driftsunderskudd 2025 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−114k kr).

NORDIC SITE SERVICES AS is registered as a limited company in Moss, Østfold with organisation number 935295017. The business is classified under other technical consultancy (NACE 71.129). The company was incorporated in 2025. Registered share capital is NOK 70,000, divided into 100 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Industrielle og byggeplass tjenester utført av internasjonale fagfolk, produksjon og fabrikasjon av ulike metallstrukturer, alle aktiviteter relatert til dette og alle andre lovlige operasjoner. Selskapet kan kjøpe og selge aksjer.”.

Key figures · 2025

Operating profit
NOK −114,000
Equity
NOK −52,000

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
0.39
Not satisfactory
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
-153.7%
Weak
Equity as a share of total capital

Solidity capped at Weak because equity is below NOK 100,000.

Who owns NORDIC SITE SERVICES AS?

LAURI TAPIO KOIVISTO
NORDIC SITE SERVICES AS
· NOK −114,000 profit

NORDIC SITE SERVICES AS has 4 registered shareholders:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about NORDIC SITE SERVICES AS

Who owns NORDIC SITE SERVICES AS?

LAURI TAPIO KOIVISTO is the largest registered owner, with 30.0%.

Who is the general manager of NORDIC SITE SERVICES AS?

Lauri Tapio Koivisto is registered as general manager of NORDIC SITE SERVICES AS.

Where is NORDIC SITE SERVICES AS based?

NORDIC SITE SERVICES AS has its business address in Moss.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.