BIZTRAC BETA
COMPANY REGISTER PROFILE
946495352 ORG. NO. 2025 ACCOUNTS 8 SECTIONS
Active UPDATED 02.09.2026
Activities of housing cooperatives

TRONES BORETTSLAG

Org. no. 946495352 Housing cooperative (BRL) Sandnes Incorporated 1978 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 984,000
Operating profit NOK 44,000
Equity NOK 10.7m
Incorporated 1978

TRONES BORETTSLAG is registered as a housing cooperative in Sandnes, Rogaland with organisation number 946495352. The business is classified under activities of housing cooperatives (NACE 97.001). The company was incorporated in 1978. The company's stated purpose is: “Borettslag.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 984,000 in revenue and NOK 44,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 984,000
Operating profit
NOK 44,000
Equity
NOK 10.7m
Est. value
NOK 6.3m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
171.38
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
70.7%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns TRONES BORETTSLAG?

No shareholders are registered for TRONES BORETTSLAG in open Norwegian sources. Shareholder data exists mainly for limited companies (AS/ASA).

Frequently asked questions about TRONES BORETTSLAG

What is the revenue of TRONES BORETTSLAG?

TRONES BORETTSLAG had revenue of NOK 984,000 in 2025.

Where is TRONES BORETTSLAG based?

TRONES BORETTSLAG has its business address in Sandnes.

Property

Business address Bedriftsveien 22, 4313 Sandnes
Cadastral unit 1108-69/1285/0/0
Building Fabrikkbygning · 1 unit

18 companies are registered at this address.

The address this company is registered at, from the company register and matched against the cadastre. It does not say who owns the property — a company may be a tenant, and the address is often its accountant's. Source: Brønnøysundregistrene and © Kartverket.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 02.09.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.