BIZTRAC BETA
COMPANY REGISTER PROFILE
951218723 ORG. NO. 2025 ACCOUNTS 8 SECTIONS
Active UPDATED 02.09.2026
Activities of housing cooperatives

BLÅFJELLET BORETTSLAG

Org. no. 951218723 Housing cooperative (BRL) Oslo Incorporated 1957 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 22.7m
Operating profit NOK 6.6m
Equity NOK 28.0m
Incorporated 1957

BLÅFJELLET BORETTSLAG is registered as a housing cooperative in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 951218723. The business is classified under activities of housing cooperatives (NACE 97.001). The company was incorporated in 1957. The company's stated purpose is: “Borettslag.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 22.7m in revenue and NOK 6.6m in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 22.7m
Operating profit
NOK 6.6m
Equity
NOK 28.0m
Est. value
NOK 33.0m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
14.33
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
33.8%
Good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns BLÅFJELLET BORETTSLAG?

No shareholders are registered for BLÅFJELLET BORETTSLAG in open Norwegian sources. Shareholder data exists mainly for limited companies (AS/ASA).

Frequently asked questions about BLÅFJELLET BORETTSLAG

What is the revenue of BLÅFJELLET BORETTSLAG?

BLÅFJELLET BORETTSLAG had revenue of NOK 22.7m in 2025.

Where is BLÅFJELLET BORETTSLAG based?

BLÅFJELLET BORETTSLAG has its business address in Oslo.

Property

Business address v/OBOS Hammersborg torg 1, 0179 Oslo
Cadastral unit 301-208/279/0/0

1650 companies are registered at this address.

The address this company is registered at, from the company register and matched against the cadastre. It does not say who owns the property — a company may be a tenant, and the address is often its accountant's. Source: Brønnøysundregistrene and © Kartverket.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 02.09.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.