BIZTRAC BETA
COMPANY REGISTER PROFILE
954316866 ORG. NO. 2025 ACCOUNTS 8 SECTIONS
Active UPDATED 02.09.2026
Non-specialised retail sale of predominately food, beverages or tobacco

BØFJORD SAMVIRKELAG SA

Org. no. 954316866 Co-operation (SA) Surnadal Incorporated 1948 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 6.9m
Operating profit NOK −83,000
Equity NOK 661,000
Incorporated 1948
Employees 5

Signals

1 flags
  • Driftsunderskudd 2025 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−83k kr).

BØFJORD SAMVIRKELAG SA is registered as a co-operation in Surnadal, Møre og Romsdal with organisation number 954316866. The business is classified under non-specialised retail sale of predominately food, beverages or tobacco (NACE 47.110). The company was incorporated in 1948 and has 5 registered employees. The company's stated purpose is: “Forbrukersamvirke.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 6.9m in revenue and NOK −83,000 in operating profit.

Former names: BØFJORD SAMVIRKELAG

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 6.9m
Operating profit
NOK −83,000
Equity
NOK 661,000
Est. value
NOK 1.7m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
2.71
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
19.4%
Good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns BØFJORD SAMVIRKELAG SA?

No shareholders are registered for BØFJORD SAMVIRKELAG SA in open Norwegian sources. Shareholder data exists mainly for limited companies (AS/ASA).

Frequently asked questions about BØFJORD SAMVIRKELAG SA

What is the revenue of BØFJORD SAMVIRKELAG SA?

BØFJORD SAMVIRKELAG SA had revenue of NOK 6.9m in 2025.

Who is the general manager of BØFJORD SAMVIRKELAG SA?

Liv Simensen Hoås is registered as general manager of BØFJORD SAMVIRKELAG SA.

Where is BØFJORD SAMVIRKELAG SA based?

BØFJORD SAMVIRKELAG SA has its business address in Bøfjorden.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 02.09.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.