BIZTRAC BETA
Other technical consultancy

RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AS

Org. no. 959399808 Limited company (AS) Asker Incorporated 1990 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 1.8m
Operating profit NOK 371,000
Equity NOK 452,000
Incorporated 1990
Share capital NOK 106,000

RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AS is registered as a limited company in Asker, Akershus with organisation number 959399808. The business is classified under other technical consultancy (NACE 71.129). The company was incorporated in 1990. Registered share capital is NOK 106,000, divided into 106 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Tilby tjenester og rådgivning rettet mot industri, offentlig forvaltning og undervisning samt investering i aksjer og eiendom. ”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 1.8m in revenue and NOK 371,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 1.8m
Operating profit
NOK 371,000
Equity
NOK 452,000
Est. value
NOK 1.8m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
2.17
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
53.9%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AS?

JON LEREIM
RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AS
NOK 1.8m rev. · NOK 371,000 profit

RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AS

Who owns RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AS?

JON LEREIM is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AS?

RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AS had revenue of NOK 1.8m in 2025.

Who is the general manager of RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AS?

Jon Lereim is registered as general manager of RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AS.

Where is RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AS based?

RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AS has its business address in Asker.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.