BIZTRAC BETA
Work training and permanently adapted work

VEKSTBEDRIFTEN VILJA AS

Org. no. 963650558 Limited company (AS) Eidskog Incorporated 1991 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2024 NOK 12.9m
Operating profit NOK 1.2m
Equity NOK 3.1m
Incorporated 1991
Employees 8
Share capital NOK 255,000

Signals

1 flags
  • Nylig endring 2026-05-05 Aksjekapital registrert 2026-05-05.

VEKSTBEDRIFTEN VILJA AS is registered as a limited company in Eidskog, Innlandet with organisation number 963650558. The business is classified under work training and permanently adapted work (NACE 88.993). The company was incorporated in 1991 and has 8 registered employees. Registered share capital is NOK 255,000, divided into 20 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “A) Varig tilrettelagt arbeid skal være tiltaksarrangørens primære virksomhet. B) Kjøp og salg av tjenester og produkter.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2024 financial year, show NOK 12.9m in revenue and NOK 1.2m in operating profit.

Key figures · 2024

Revenue
NOK 12.9m
Operating profit
NOK 1.2m
Equity
NOK 3.1m
Est. value
NOK 7.5m

Financial health · 2024

Liquidity
3.27
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
47.3%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns VEKSTBEDRIFTEN VILJA AS?

No shareholders are registered for VEKSTBEDRIFTEN VILJA AS in open Norwegian sources. Shareholder data exists mainly for limited companies (AS/ASA).

Frequently asked questions about VEKSTBEDRIFTEN VILJA AS

What is the revenue of VEKSTBEDRIFTEN VILJA AS?

VEKSTBEDRIFTEN VILJA AS had revenue of NOK 12.9m in 2024.

Who is the general manager of VEKSTBEDRIFTEN VILJA AS?

Terje Granheim is registered as general manager of VEKSTBEDRIFTEN VILJA AS.

Where is VEKSTBEDRIFTEN VILJA AS based?

VEKSTBEDRIFTEN VILJA AS has its business address in Skotterud.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.