BIZTRAC BETA
Research and experimental development on natural sciences and engineering

SPERMATECH AS

Org. no. 984698542 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 2002 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 443,000
Operating profit NOK 170,000
Equity NOK 305,000
Incorporated 2002
Share capital NOK 244,000

SPERMATECH AS is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 984698542. The business is classified under research and experimental development on natural sciences and engineering (NACE 72.100). The company was incorporated in 2002. Registered share capital is NOK 244,000, divided into 243804 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Utvikle og kommersialisere teknologi i tilknytning til C@S og andre substanser som kan påvirke kroppens funksjoner og drive økonomisk virksomhet i tilknytning til dette.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 443,000 in revenue and NOK 170,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 443,000
Operating profit
NOK 170,000
Equity
NOK 305,000
Est. value
NOK 735,000

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
3.60
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
72.2%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns SPERMATECH AS?

SKILLING SYSTEMER AS
SPERMATECH AS
NOK 443,000 rev. · NOK 170,000 profit

SPERMATECH AS has 20+ registered shareholders:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about SPERMATECH AS

Who owns SPERMATECH AS?

SKILLING SYSTEMER AS is the largest registered owner, with 15.9%.

What is the revenue of SPERMATECH AS?

SPERMATECH AS had revenue of NOK 443,000 in 2025.

Who is the general manager of SPERMATECH AS?

Espen Marcelius Gjems is registered as general manager of SPERMATECH AS.

Where is SPERMATECH AS based?

SPERMATECH AS has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.