BIZTRAC BETA
Industrial product and fashion design activities

ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS

Org. no. 989169939 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 2005 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 3.3m
Operating profit NOK 485,000
Equity NOK 1.4m
Incorporated 2005
Share capital NOK 100,000

ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 989169939. The business is classified under industrial product and fashion design activities (NACE 74.110). The company was incorporated in 2005. Registered share capital is NOK 100,000, divided into 10000 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Investeringer i aksjer og dertil beslektet virksomhet.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 3.3m in revenue and NOK 485,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 3.3m
Operating profit
NOK 485,000
Equity
NOK 1.4m
Est. value
NOK 3.3m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
2.26
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
61.2%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS?

ANDREAS ENGESVIK
ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS
NOK 3.3m rev. · NOK 485,000 profit

ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Which companies does ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS own?

ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS holds a stake in 1 company:

See the full ownership structure →

Frequently asked questions about ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS

Who owns ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS?

ANDREAS ENGESVIK is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS?

ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS had revenue of NOK 3.3m in 2025.

Who is the general manager of ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS?

Andreas Engesvik is registered as general manager of ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS.

Where is ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS based?

ANDREAS ENGESVIK AS has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.