BIZTRAC BETA
Rental and operating of own or leased real estate

KJØTTEINSVEGEN 71 AS

Org. no. 989397842 Limited company (AS) Trondheim Incorporated 2006 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2024 NOK 2.0m
Operating profit NOK 1.3m
Equity NOK 3.2m
Incorporated 2006
Share capital NOK 300,000

Signals

1 flags
  • Ingen revisor Selskapet har ingen registrert revisor. Vanlig for små AS som har valgt bort revisjon, men verdt å merke seg.

KJØTTEINSVEGEN 71 AS is registered as a limited company in Trondheim, Trøndelag with organisation number 989397842. The business is classified under rental and operating of own or leased real estate (NACE 68.200). The company was incorporated in 2006. Registered share capital is NOK 300,000, divided into 300 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Utvikling og investering i andre selskaper og alt som står i forbindelse med de forannevnte virksomheter.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2024 financial year, show NOK 2.0m in revenue and NOK 1.3m in operating profit.

Key figures · 2024

Revenue
NOK 2.0m
Operating profit
NOK 1.3m
Equity
NOK 3.2m
Est. value
NOK 4.5m

Financial health · 2024

Liquidity
0.72
Weak
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
29.4%
Good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns KJØTTEINSVEGEN 71 AS?

SLATE EUROPEAN ESSENTIAL RE (BOGSTAD) AS
KJØTTEINSVEGEN 71 AS
NOK 2.0m rev. · NOK 1.3m profit

KJØTTEINSVEGEN 71 AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about KJØTTEINSVEGEN 71 AS

Who owns KJØTTEINSVEGEN 71 AS?

SLATE EUROPEAN ESSENTIAL RE (BOGSTAD) AS is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of KJØTTEINSVEGEN 71 AS?

KJØTTEINSVEGEN 71 AS had revenue of NOK 2.0m in 2024.

Where is KJØTTEINSVEGEN 71 AS based?

KJØTTEINSVEGEN 71 AS has its business address in Trondheim.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.