BIZTRAC BETA
Rental and operating of own or leased real estate

ESKERVEGEN 1 OG 5 AS

Org. no. 989425854 Limited company (AS) Stavanger Incorporated 2006 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 12.4m
Operating profit NOK 8.0m
Equity NOK 23.0m
Incorporated 2006
Share capital NOK 182,000

Signals

1 flags
  • Ingen revisor Selskapet har ingen registrert revisor. Vanlig for små AS som har valgt bort revisjon, men verdt å merke seg.

ESKERVEGEN 1 OG 5 AS is registered as a limited company in Stavanger, Rogaland with organisation number 989425854. The business is classified under rental and operating of own or leased real estate (NACE 68.200). The company was incorporated in 2006. Registered share capital is NOK 182,000, divided into 100 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Kjøp, utvikling, utleie og salg av eiendom, finansaktiva, aksjer og rettigheter til eiendom, finansaktiva og aksjer.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 12.4m in revenue and NOK 8.0m in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 12.4m
Operating profit
NOK 8.0m
Equity
NOK 23.0m
Est. value
NOK 26.4m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
0.84
Weak
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
20.5%
Good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns ESKERVEGEN 1 OG 5 AS?

KVERNELAND EIENDOMSUTVIKLING AS
ESKERVEGEN 1 OG 5 AS
NOK 12.4m rev. · NOK 8.0m profit

ESKERVEGEN 1 OG 5 AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about ESKERVEGEN 1 OG 5 AS

Who owns ESKERVEGEN 1 OG 5 AS?

KVERNELAND EIENDOMSUTVIKLING AS is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of ESKERVEGEN 1 OG 5 AS?

ESKERVEGEN 1 OG 5 AS had revenue of NOK 12.4m in 2025.

Where is ESKERVEGEN 1 OG 5 AS based?

ESKERVEGEN 1 OG 5 AS has its business address in Stavanger.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.