BIZTRAC BETA
Photographic activities

FOTO FOR ALLE AS

Org. no. 989749560 Limited company (AS) Sandefjord Incorporated 2006 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 4.7m
Operating profit NOK 84,000
Equity NOK 348,000
Incorporated 2006
Share capital NOK 100,000

Signals

1 flags
  • Ingen revisor Selskapet har ingen registrert revisor. Vanlig for små AS som har valgt bort revisjon, men verdt å merke seg.

FOTO FOR ALLE AS is registered as a limited company in Sandefjord, Vestfold with organisation number 989749560. The business is classified under photographic activities (NACE 74.200). The company was incorporated in 2006. Registered share capital is NOK 100,000, divided into 100 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Fotografering av barn i barnehager og skoler. Produkt, reklame og generell studiofotografering.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 4.7m in revenue and NOK 84,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 4.7m
Operating profit
NOK 84,000
Equity
NOK 348,000
Est. value
NOK 603,000

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
1.83
Good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
45.5%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns FOTO FOR ALLE AS?

PREUS PRO LAB AS
FOTO FOR ALLE AS
NOK 4.7m rev. · NOK 84,000 profit

FOTO FOR ALLE AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about FOTO FOR ALLE AS

Who owns FOTO FOR ALLE AS?

PREUS PRO LAB AS is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of FOTO FOR ALLE AS?

FOTO FOR ALLE AS had revenue of NOK 4.7m in 2025.

Who is the general manager of FOTO FOR ALLE AS?

Magne Bredo Finslo is registered as general manager of FOTO FOR ALLE AS.

Where is FOTO FOR ALLE AS based?

FOTO FOR ALLE AS has its business address in Sandefjord.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.