BIZTRAC BETA
COMPANY REGISTER PROFILE
990357005 ORG. NO. 2025 ACCOUNTS 7 SECTIONS
Active UPDATED 02.09.2026
Legal activities

ADVOKAT PETTER CHRISTIAN WILSKOW

Org. no. 990357005 Sole proprietorship (ENK) Moss Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 1.6m
Operating profit NOK 1.1m
Equity NOK 263,000

ADVOKAT PETTER CHRISTIAN WILSKOW is registered as a sole proprietorship in Moss, Østfold with organisation number 990357005. The business is classified under legal activities (NACE 69.100). The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 1.6m in revenue and NOK 1.1m in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 1.6m
Operating profit
NOK 1.1m
Equity
NOK 263,000
Est. value
NOK 3.5m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
4.18
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
68.2%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns ADVOKAT PETTER CHRISTIAN WILSKOW?

No shareholders are registered for ADVOKAT PETTER CHRISTIAN WILSKOW in open Norwegian sources. Shareholder data exists mainly for limited companies (AS/ASA).

Frequently asked questions about ADVOKAT PETTER CHRISTIAN WILSKOW

What is the revenue of ADVOKAT PETTER CHRISTIAN WILSKOW?

ADVOKAT PETTER CHRISTIAN WILSKOW had revenue of NOK 1.6m in 2025.

Where is ADVOKAT PETTER CHRISTIAN WILSKOW based?

ADVOKAT PETTER CHRISTIAN WILSKOW has its business address in Moss.

Property

Business address Cort Adelers gate 8, 1515 Moss
Cadastral unit 3103-1/3486/0/0
Building Kontor- og administrasjonsbygning, rådhus · 8 units

10 companies are registered at this address.

The address this company is registered at, from the company register and matched against the cadastre. It does not say who owns the property — a company may be a tenant, and the address is often its accountant's. Source: Brønnøysundregistrene and © Kartverket.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 02.09.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.