BIZTRAC BETA
Rental and operating of own or leased real estate

GAMLE FORUSVEIEN 51B AS

Org. no. 992035420 Limited company (AS) Stavanger Incorporated 2007 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 2.2m
Operating profit NOK 2.0m
Equity NOK 22.9m
Incorporated 2007
Share capital NOK 1.6m

Signals

1 flags
  • Ingen revisor Selskapet har ingen registrert revisor. Vanlig for små AS som har valgt bort revisjon, men verdt å merke seg.

GAMLE FORUSVEIEN 51B AS is registered as a limited company in Stavanger, Rogaland with organisation number 992035420. The business is classified under rental and operating of own or leased real estate (NACE 68.200). The company was incorporated in 2007. Registered share capital is NOK 1.6m, divided into 200 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Kjøp og salg samt utleie og forvaltning av fast eiendom, samt deltakelse i andre selskaper.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 2.2m in revenue and NOK 2.0m in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 2.2m
Operating profit
NOK 2.0m
Equity
NOK 22.9m
Est. value
NOK 20.4m

Financial health · 2024

Liquidity
0.00
Not satisfactory
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
90.2%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns GAMLE FORUSVEIEN 51B AS?

FORUS AREAL HOLDING 1 AS
GAMLE FORUSVEIEN 51B AS
NOK 2.2m rev. · NOK 2.0m profit

GAMLE FORUSVEIEN 51B AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about GAMLE FORUSVEIEN 51B AS

Who owns GAMLE FORUSVEIEN 51B AS?

FORUS AREAL HOLDING 1 AS is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of GAMLE FORUSVEIEN 51B AS?

GAMLE FORUSVEIEN 51B AS had revenue of NOK 2.2m in 2025.

Where is GAMLE FORUSVEIEN 51B AS based?

GAMLE FORUSVEIEN 51B AS has its business address in Stavanger.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.