BIZTRAC BETA
COMPANY REGISTER PROFILE
993373060 ORG. NO. 2025 ACCOUNTS 9 SECTIONS
Active UPDATED 02.09.2026
Temporary employment agency activities and other human resource provisions

UAB BALTIC BYGG PARTNERS NUF

Org. no. 993373060 Norwegian division of foreign business enterprise (NUF) Sandnes Active
Ownership graph ↗
Operating profit NOK 13,000
Equity NOK 611,000

UAB BALTIC BYGG PARTNERS NUF is registered as a norwegian division of foreign business enterprise in Sandnes, Rogaland with organisation number 993373060. The business is classified under temporary employment agency activities and other human resource provisions (NACE 78.200).

Former names: UBA BALTIC BYGG PARTNERS, UAB BALTIC BYGG PARTNERS

Key figures · 2025

Operating profit
NOK 13,000
Equity
NOK 611,000
Est. value
NOK 377,000

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
2.48
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
56.0%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns UAB BALTIC BYGG PARTNERS NUF?

No shareholders are registered for UAB BALTIC BYGG PARTNERS NUF in open Norwegian sources. Shareholder data exists mainly for limited companies (AS/ASA).

Frequently asked questions about UAB BALTIC BYGG PARTNERS NUF

Who is the general manager of UAB BALTIC BYGG PARTNERS NUF?

Marjan Janusevskij is registered as general manager of UAB BALTIC BYGG PARTNERS NUF.

Where is UAB BALTIC BYGG PARTNERS NUF based?

UAB BALTIC BYGG PARTNERS NUF has its business address in Sandnes.

Property

Business address Gravarstunet 35, 4327 Sandnes
Cadastral unit 1108-39/1184/0/0
Building Enebolig · 1 unit

The address this company is registered at, from the company register and matched against the cadastre. It does not say who owns the property — a company may be a tenant, and the address is often its accountant's. Source: Brønnøysundregistrene and © Kartverket.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 02.09.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.