BIZTRAC BETA
Activities of specialist physicians, other than psychiatrists

HAMAR GYNEKOLOGI AS

Org. no. 994469061 Limited company (AS) Hamar Incorporated 2009 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 6.9m
Operating profit NOK 3.7m
Equity NOK 17.7m
Incorporated 2009
Share capital NOK 100,000

HAMAR GYNEKOLOGI AS is registered as a limited company in Hamar, Innlandet with organisation number 994469061. The business is classified under activities of specialist physicians, other than psychiatrists (NACE 86.221). The company was incorporated in 2009. Registered share capital is NOK 100,000, divided into 100 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Spesialist innen helsetjenester samt alt hva hermed måtte stå i forbindelse. Dessuten investering i aksjer og andre verdipapirer og deltakelse i andre selskaper.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 6.9m in revenue and NOK 3.7m in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 6.9m
Operating profit
NOK 3.7m
Equity
NOK 17.7m
Est. value
NOK 26.7m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
12.92
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
92.5%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns HAMAR GYNEKOLOGI AS?

GREGOR BERNHARD BECK
HAMAR GYNEKOLOGI AS
NOK 6.9m rev. · NOK 3.7m profit

HAMAR GYNEKOLOGI AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about HAMAR GYNEKOLOGI AS

Who owns HAMAR GYNEKOLOGI AS?

GREGOR BERNHARD BECK is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of HAMAR GYNEKOLOGI AS?

HAMAR GYNEKOLOGI AS had revenue of NOK 6.9m in 2025.

Who is the general manager of HAMAR GYNEKOLOGI AS?

Gregor Bernhard Beck is registered as general manager of HAMAR GYNEKOLOGI AS.

Where is HAMAR GYNEKOLOGI AS based?

HAMAR GYNEKOLOGI AS has its business address in Hamar.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.