BIZTRAC BETA
Development of building projects

METRO UTVIKLING AS

Org. no. 997732715 Limited company (AS) Oslo Incorporated 2011 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Operating profit NOK −5.9m
Equity NOK 37.1m
Incorporated 2011
Share capital NOK 150,000

Signals

2 flags
  • Driftsunderskudd 2024 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−5,9 mill kr).
  • Ingen revisor Selskapet har ingen registrert revisor. Vanlig for små AS som har valgt bort revisjon, men verdt å merke seg.

METRO UTVIKLING AS is registered as a limited company in Oslo, Oslo with organisation number 997732715. The business is classified under development of building projects (NACE 68.120). The company was incorporated in 2011. Registered share capital is NOK 150,000, divided into 150 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Kjøp, salg og utvikling av eiendom og alt som naturlig hører inn under dette.”.

Key figures · 2024

Operating profit
NOK −5.9m
Equity
NOK 37.1m
Est. value
NOK 33.9m

Financial health · 2024

Liquidity
2.74
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
51.3%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns METRO UTVIKLING AS?

RINGDAL PATENTER AS
METRO UTVIKLING AS
· NOK −5.9m profit

METRO UTVIKLING AS has 3 registered shareholders:

All shareholders and roles →

Which companies does METRO UTVIKLING AS own?

METRO UTVIKLING AS holds a stake in 1 company:

See the full ownership structure →

Group structure

METRO UTVIKLING AS er morselskap for 8 datterselskaper:

Frequently asked questions about METRO UTVIKLING AS

Who owns METRO UTVIKLING AS?

RINGDAL PATENTER AS is the largest registered owner, with 33.3%.

Who is the general manager of METRO UTVIKLING AS?

Lars Ringdal is registered as general manager of METRO UTVIKLING AS.

Where is METRO UTVIKLING AS based?

METRO UTVIKLING AS has its business address in Oslo.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.