BIZTRAC BETA
General cleaning of buildings

EKO RENHOLD KATIA AS

Org. no. 998277426 Limited company (AS) Sandnes Incorporated 2012 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 4.2m
Operating profit NOK 882,000
Equity NOK 569,000
Incorporated 2012
Employees 13
Share capital NOK 30,000

EKO RENHOLD KATIA AS is registered as a limited company in Sandnes, Rogaland with organisation number 998277426. The business is classified under general cleaning of buildings (NACE 81.210). The company was incorporated in 2012 and has 13 registered employees. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 300 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Renholdstjenester / pedikyr/manikyr / catering og andre produkter/tjenester som naturlig hører sammen med dette.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 4.2m in revenue and NOK 882,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 4.2m
Operating profit
NOK 882,000
Equity
NOK 569,000
Est. value
NOK 3.0m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
1.27
Satisfactory
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
31.9%
Good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns EKO RENHOLD KATIA AS?

KATIA REGINA OLSEN LUNDEGAARD
EKO RENHOLD KATIA AS
NOK 4.2m rev. · NOK 882,000 profit

EKO RENHOLD KATIA AS has 1 registered shareholder:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about EKO RENHOLD KATIA AS

Who owns EKO RENHOLD KATIA AS?

KATIA REGINA OLSEN LUNDEGAARD is the largest registered owner, with 100.0%.

What is the revenue of EKO RENHOLD KATIA AS?

EKO RENHOLD KATIA AS had revenue of NOK 4.2m in 2025.

Who is the general manager of EKO RENHOLD KATIA AS?

Katia Regina Olsen Lundegaard is registered as general manager of EKO RENHOLD KATIA AS.

Where is EKO RENHOLD KATIA AS based?

EKO RENHOLD KATIA AS has its business address in Sandnes.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.