BIZTRAC BETA
Site preparation

BRØDR. SKAMMELSRUD AS

Org. no. 998494443 Limited company (AS) Rakkestad Incorporated 2012 Active
Ownership graph ↗
Revenue 2025 NOK 1.7m
Operating profit NOK −422,000
Equity NOK 979,000
Incorporated 2012
Share capital NOK 30,000

Signals

1 flags
  • Driftsunderskudd 2025 Siste driftsresultat er negativt (−422k kr).

BRØDR. SKAMMELSRUD AS is registered as a limited company in Rakkestad, Østfold with organisation number 998494443. The business is classified under site preparation (NACE 43.120). The company was incorporated in 2012. Registered share capital is NOK 30,000, divided into 100 shares. The company's stated purpose is: “Salg av leiekjøring og andre produkter/tjenester som naturlig hører sammen med dette, herunder å delta i andre selskap med lignende virksomhet, og kjøp og salg av aksjer eller på annen måte gjøre seg interessert i andre foretak.”. The most recent filed accounts, for the 2025 financial year, show NOK 1.7m in revenue and NOK −422,000 in operating profit.

Key figures · 2025

Revenue
NOK 1.7m
Operating profit
NOK −422,000
Equity
NOK 979,000
Est. value
NOK 1.0m

Financial health · 2025

Liquidity
2.76
Very good
Current assets ÷ current liabilities
Profitability
Not available
Return on total assets
Solidity
74.1%
Very good
Equity as a share of total capital

Who owns BRØDR. SKAMMELSRUD AS?

TOM HELGE SKAMMELSRUD
BRØDR. SKAMMELSRUD AS
NOK 1.7m rev. · NOK −422,000 profit

BRØDR. SKAMMELSRUD AS has 3 registered shareholders:

All shareholders and roles →

Frequently asked questions about BRØDR. SKAMMELSRUD AS

Who owns BRØDR. SKAMMELSRUD AS?

TOM HELGE SKAMMELSRUD is the largest registered owner, with 34.0%.

What is the revenue of BRØDR. SKAMMELSRUD AS?

BRØDR. SKAMMELSRUD AS had revenue of NOK 1.7m in 2025.

Where is BRØDR. SKAMMELSRUD AS based?

BRØDR. SKAMMELSRUD AS has its business address in Degernes.

Source: Biztrac.no · Data from the Brønnøysund Register Centre and the Norwegian Tax Administration · Last updated 15.06.2026.

Report a problem

Found a technical fault, or something wrong in the data? Tell us what happened.